Search
Compare

Nvidia GTX Titan Black 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card

3.4/10 Score 3007
Nvidia GTX Titan Black 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
4.2/10 Score 3768
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card
vs
$ 270
$ 400
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
GPU ArchitectureShading UnitsGPU ClockGPU Boost ClockMemory CapacityMemory TypeMemory SpeedMemory Bus WidthMemory BandwidthTexture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill RateTexture Fill RateFloating Point Per SecondDirectXOpenGLMax GPU TempratureGraphics Card PowerRise of the Tomb RaiderShadow of the Tomb RaiderThe Witcher 3Metro ExodusBattlefield 1Far Cry 5Assassin's Creed UnityResident Evil 2
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

28 nm

16 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

2880

1920

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second

889 MHz

45% higher

1607 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance

980 MHz

45% higher

1797 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

6 GB

8 GB

Memory Type

GDDR5

GDDR5

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data

7 Gbps

13% higher

8 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

384 bit

256 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM
24% higher

336 GB/s

256 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

240

120

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

48

64

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second

47 GP/s

59% higher

115 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second
8% higher

235 GT/s

216 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

6 Flop/s

7 Flop/s

DirectX

12

12

OpenGL

5

5

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

203 °F

201 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board

250 Watts

40% lower

150 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

62 fps

14% higher

72 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

50 fps

4% higher

52 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p

63 fps

7% higher

68 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p

65 fps

7% higher

70 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p
1% higher

84 fps

83 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p

58 fps

13% higher

67 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p

37 fps

37 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p

50 fps

24% higher

66 fps

Recommended
4.2/10 Score 3768
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 8GB 8Gbps 256-bit 150W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 15
GPU Architecture 16 nm vs 28 nm GPU architecture size is (12nm) 43% smaller
GPU Clock 1607 MHz vs 889 MHz Clock speed is (718MHz) 45% higher
GPU Boost Clock 1797 MHz vs 980 MHz Boost clock speed is (817MHz) 45% higher
Memory Capacity 8 GB vs 6 GB (2GB) 25% more VRAM Capacity
Memory Speed 8 Gbps vs 7 Gbps Transfer speed of the memory is (1Gbps) 13% faster
Render Output Unit (ROP) 64 vs 48 (16) 25% more Render Output Units
Pixel Fill Rate 115 GP/s vs 47 GP/s Pixel Fill Rate is (68GP/s) 59% faster
Floating Point Per Second 7 Flop/s vs 6 Flop/s (1Flop/s) 14% more Floating Point Operations per minute
Graphics Card Power 150 Watts vs 250 Watts Power consumption is (100Watts) 40% lower
Rise of the Tomb Raider 72 fps vs 62 fps Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (10fps) 14% more frames per second
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 52 fps vs 50 fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (2fps) 4% more frames per second
The Witcher 3 68 fps vs 63 fps The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (5fps) 7% more frames per second
Metro Exodus 70 fps vs 65 fps Metro Exodus - 1440p: (5fps) 7% more frames per second
Far Cry 5 67 fps vs 58 fps Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (9fps) 13% more frames per second
Resident Evil 2 66 fps vs 50 fps Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (16fps) 24% more frames per second
CONS 5
Shading Units 1920 vs 2880 (960) 33% less Shader Processing Units
Memory Bandwidth 256 GB/s vs 336 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (80GB/s) 24% slower
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) 120 vs 240 (120) 50% less Texture Mapping Units
Texture Fill Rate 216 GT/s vs 235 GT/s Texel Fill Rate is (19GT/s) 8% slower
Battlefield 1 83 fps vs 84 fps Battlefield 1 - 1440p: (1fps) 1% less frames per second
2nd Choice
3.4/10 Score 3007
Nvidia GTX Titan Black 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia GTX Titan Black 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti Nvidia RTX 4070 Ti
vs
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
Radeon R9 NANO Radeon R9 NANO
vs
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
Nvidia GTX 1660 SUPER Nvidia GTX 1660 SUPER
vs
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
Nvidia EVGA GTX 1070 Nvidia EVGA GTX 1070
vs
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
Radeon R9 FURY Radeon R9 FURY
vs
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
Nvidia Turbo 1060 Nvidia Turbo 1060
vs
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
Nvidia GTX 1650 SUPER Nvidia GTX 1650 SUPER
vs
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
Nvidia RTX 3070 Ti Nvidia RTX 3070 Ti
vs
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
Nvidia Windforce 1080 Nvidia Windforce 1080
vs
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
AMD RX 5600 AMD RX 5600
vs