Search
Compare

Nvidia GTX Titan Black 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card Nvidia MSI Aero 1080 8GB 10Gbps 256-bit 180W Desktop Graphic card

3.4/10 Score 3007
Nvidia GTX Titan Black 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
4.3/10 Score 3852
Nvidia MSI Aero 1080 8GB 10Gbps 256-bit 180W Desktop Graphic card
vs
$ 270
$ 600
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
GPU ArchitectureShading UnitsGPU ClockGPU Boost ClockMemory CapacityMemory TypeMemory SpeedMemory Bus WidthMemory BandwidthTexture Mapping Unit (TMU)Render Output Unit (ROP)Pixel Fill RateTexture Fill RateFloating Point Per SecondDirectXOpenGLMax GPU TempratureGraphics Card PowerRise of the Tomb RaiderShadow of the Tomb RaiderThe Witcher 3Metro ExodusBattlefield 1Far Cry 5Assassin's Creed UnityResident Evil 2
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
GPU Architecture The smaller GPU, the better performance

28 nm

16 nm

Shading Units The more Cores, the faster data are processed by the GPU

2880

2560

GPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions the GPU can execute per second

889 MHz

46% higher

1632 MHz

GPU Boost Clock The Boost clock helps GPU to get more performance

980 MHz

45% higher

1771 MHz

Memory Capacity The VRAM capacity is used most for Anti Aliasing, Textures and Screen resolution

6 GB

8 GB

Memory Type

GDDR5

GDDR5X

Memory Speed The faster Memory, the faster Read/Write operations of the data

7 Gbps

30% higher

10 Gbps

Memory Bus Width The Wider Memory Bus, the more data can flow without waiting

384 bit

256 bit

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data transfers between GPU and VRAM
5% higher

336 GB/s

320 GB/s

Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) The more Texture Mapping Units, the faster Texture Fill Rate

240

160

Render Output Unit (ROP) The more Rander Output Units, the faster Pixel Fill Rate

48

64

Pixel Fill Rate Indicates how many Pixels GPU can draw per second

47 GP/s

58% higher

113 GP/s

Texture Fill Rate Indicates how many Textures can be mapped per second

235 GT/s

17% higher

283 GT/s

Floating Point Per Second The more Floating Point Operations per second the better performance of the GPU

6 Flop/s

9 Flop/s

DirectX

12

12

OpenGL

5

5

Max GPU Temprature The maximum GPU temprature allowed by manufacturer

203 °F

201 °F

Graphics Card Power Typical power consumption of the graphic card board

250 Watts

28% lower

180 Watts

Rise of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

62 fps

33% higher

92 fps

Shadow of the Tomb Raider Settings Max, 1440p

50 fps

24% higher

66 fps

The Witcher 3 Settings Max, 1440p

63 fps

33% higher

94 fps

Metro Exodus Settings Max, 1440p

65 fps

32% higher

96 fps

Battlefield 1 Settings Max, 1440p

84 fps

18% higher

102 fps

Far Cry 5 Settings Max, 1440p

58 fps

29% higher

82 fps

Assassin's Creed Unity Settings Max, 1440p

37 fps

46% higher

68 fps

Resident Evil 2 Settings Max, 1440p

50 fps

39% higher

82 fps

Recommended
4.3/10 Score 3852
Nvidia MSI Aero 1080 8GB 10Gbps 256-bit 180W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia MSI Aero 1080 8GB 10Gbps 256-bit 180W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 18
GPU Architecture 16 nm vs 28 nm GPU architecture size is (12nm) 43% smaller
GPU Clock 1632 MHz vs 889 MHz Clock speed is (743MHz) 46% higher
GPU Boost Clock 1771 MHz vs 980 MHz Boost clock speed is (791MHz) 45% higher
Memory Capacity 8 GB vs 6 GB (2GB) 25% more VRAM Capacity
Memory Speed 10 Gbps vs 7 Gbps Transfer speed of the memory is (3Gbps) 30% faster
Render Output Unit (ROP) 64 vs 48 (16) 25% more Render Output Units
Pixel Fill Rate 113 GP/s vs 47 GP/s Pixel Fill Rate is (66GP/s) 58% faster
Texture Fill Rate 283 GT/s vs 235 GT/s Texel Fill Rate is (48GT/s) 17% faster
Floating Point Per Second 9 Flop/s vs 6 Flop/s (3Flop/s) 33% more Floating Point Operations per minute
Graphics Card Power 180 Watts vs 250 Watts Power consumption is (70Watts) 28% lower
Rise of the Tomb Raider 92 fps vs 62 fps Rise of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (30fps) 33% more frames per second
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 66 fps vs 50 fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider - 1440p: (16fps) 24% more frames per second
The Witcher 3 94 fps vs 63 fps The Witcher 3 - 1440p: (31fps) 33% more frames per second
Metro Exodus 96 fps vs 65 fps Metro Exodus - 1440p: (31fps) 32% more frames per second
Battlefield 1 102 fps vs 84 fps Battlefield 1 - 1440p: (18fps) 18% more frames per second
Far Cry 5 82 fps vs 58 fps Far Cry 5 - 1440p: (24fps) 29% more frames per second
Assassin's Creed Unity 68 fps vs 37 fps Assassin's Creed Unity - 1440p: (31fps) 46% more frames per second
Resident Evil 2 82 fps vs 50 fps Resident Evil 2 - 1440p: (32fps) 39% more frames per second
CONS 3
Shading Units 2560 vs 2880 (320) 11% less Shader Processing Units
Memory Bandwidth 320 GB/s vs 336 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (16GB/s) 5% slower
Texture Mapping Unit (TMU) 160 vs 240 (80) 33% less Texture Mapping Units
2nd Choice
3.4/10 Score 3007
Nvidia GTX Titan Black 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Add to Favorite
Nvidia GTX Titan Black 6GB 7Gbps 384-bit 250W Desktop Graphic card
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Nvidia MSI Aero 1080 Nvidia MSI Aero 1080
AMD RX 5500 XT AMD RX 5500 XT
vs
Nvidia MSI Aero 1080 Nvidia MSI Aero 1080
Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070 Nvidia Sea Hawk 1070
vs
Nvidia MSI Aero 1080 Nvidia MSI Aero 1080
Nvidia GTX 750 Ti Nvidia GTX 750 Ti
vs
Nvidia MSI Aero 1080 Nvidia MSI Aero 1080
Nvidia GameRock 1080 Nvidia GameRock 1080
vs
Nvidia MSI Aero 1080 Nvidia MSI Aero 1080
Nvidia Palit Dual 1060 Nvidia Palit Dual 1060
vs
Nvidia MSI Aero 1080 Nvidia MSI Aero 1080
Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti Nvidia RTX 3060 Ti
vs
Nvidia MSI Aero 1080 Nvidia MSI Aero 1080
Nvidia Xtreme 1060 Nvidia Xtreme 1060
vs
Nvidia MSI Aero 1080 Nvidia MSI Aero 1080
Nvidia Windforce 1070 Nvidia Windforce 1070
vs
Nvidia MSI Aero 1080 Nvidia MSI Aero 1080
Nvidia GTX 960 Nvidia GTX 960
vs
Nvidia MSI Aero 1080 Nvidia MSI Aero 1080
Radeon R9 290 Radeon R9 290
vs