Search
Compare

Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

5.1/10 Score 3728
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 460
$ 1000
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

10

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

20

16

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

2.8 GHz

13% higher

3.2 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
29% higher

5.2 GHz

3.7 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

20 MB

20 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

45.8 GB/s

40% faster

76.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

10

6

Socket

1200

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
54% lower

65 Watts

140 Watts

Recommended
5.1/10 Score 3728
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
Cores 10 vs 8 (2) 20% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 16 (4) 20% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 5.2 GHz vs 3.7 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.5GHz) 29% higher
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% lower
CONS 2
CPU Clock 2.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz Clock speed is (0.4GHz) 13% lower
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (31GB/s) 40% slower
2nd Choice
5.2/10 Score 3813
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-6900K 8-core 3.2 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
AMD Ryzen 3970X AMD Ryzen 3970X
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i3-7320 Intel i3-7320
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-4770K Intel i7-4770K
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-3470 Intel i5-3470
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-5960X Intel i7-5960X
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i3-4330T Intel i3-4330T
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-11600 Intel i5-11600
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-11700KF Intel i7-11700KF
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-10700 Intel i7-10700
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-7400T Intel i5-7400T
vs