Search
Compare

Intel i7-6800K 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor

5/10 Score 3656
Intel i7-6800K 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
5.1/10 Score 3728
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 380
$ 460
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

10

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

20

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
18% higher

3.4 GHz

2.8 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.6 GHz

31% higher

5.2 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

15 MB

20 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
40% faster

76.8 GB/s

45.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

6

10

Socket

2011

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

54% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
5.1/10 Score 3728
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-10900 10-core 2.8 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 10 vs 6 (4) 40% more physical cores
Threads 20 vs 12 (8) 40% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 5.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.6GHz) 31% higher
Cache 20 MB vs 15 MB (5MB) 25% bigger processor cache memory
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% lower
CONS 2
CPU Clock 2.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz Clock speed is (0.6GHz) 18% lower
Memory Bandwidth 45.8 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (31GB/s) 40% slower
2nd Choice
5/10 Score 3656
Intel i7-6800K 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-6800K 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-3770K Intel i7-3770K
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-9400 Intel i5-9400
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i3-4170 Intel i3-4170
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-3770K Intel i7-3770K
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-3470T Intel i5-3470T
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-9600KF Intel i5-9600KF
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-9500T Intel i5-9500T
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i5-9400T Intel i5-9400T
vs
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
Intel i7-8700K Intel i7-8700K
vs