Search
Compare

Intel i7-6800K 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor Intel i7-9700K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor

5/10 Score 3656
Intel i7-6800K 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
4.6/10 Score 3389
Intel i7-9700K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 380
$ 380
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

8

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

8

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.4 GHz

6% higher

3.6 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.6 GHz

27% higher

4.9 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

15 MB

12 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
46% faster

76.8 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

128 GB

128 GB

Generation

6

9

Socket

2011

1151

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

32% lower

95 Watts

Recommended
4.6/10 Score 3389
Intel i7-9700K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-9700K 8-core 3.6 GHz Socket 1151 95W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
Cores 8 vs 6 (2) 25% more physical cores
CPU Clock 3.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz Clock speed is (0.2GHz) 6% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (1.3GHz) 27% higher
Thermal Design Power 95 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (45Watts) 32% lower
CONS 3
Threads 8 vs 12 (4) 33% less logical cores
Cache 12 MB vs 15 MB (3MB) 20% smaller processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 76.8 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (35.2GB/s) 46% slower
2nd Choice
5/10 Score 3656
Intel i7-6800K 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-6800K 6-core 3.4 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i5-8400T Intel i5-8400T
vs
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i3-9100T Intel i3-9100T
vs
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i7-11700T Intel i7-11700T
vs
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i3-4360 Intel i3-4360
vs
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i5-4460 Intel i5-4460
vs
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
vs
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i7-4770 Intel i7-4770
vs
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i5-8500T Intel i5-8500T
vs
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i5-4670S Intel i5-4670S
vs
Intel i7-9700K Intel i7-9700K
Intel i7-4790S Intel i7-4790S
vs