Search
Compare

Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor Intel i3-10300 4-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor

3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
4.4/10 Score 3254
Intel i3-10300 4-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 440
$ 180
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

22 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

4

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

8

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.3 GHz

11% higher

3.7 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.6 GHz

18% higher

4.4 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

15 MB

8 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
39% faster

68 GB/s

41.6 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

128 GB

Generation

5

10

Socket

2011

1200

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

54% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
4.4/10 Score 3254
Intel i3-10300 4-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-10300 4-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1200 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 22 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% bigger
CPU Clock 3.7 GHz vs 3.3 GHz Clock speed is (0.4GHz) 11% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.4 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.8GHz) 18% higher
Maximum Memory 128 GB vs 64 GB Maximium memory is (64GB) 50% more
Thermal Design Power 65 Watts vs 140 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% lower
CONS 4
Cores 4 vs 6 (2) 33% less physical cores
Threads 8 vs 12 (4) 33% less logical cores
Cache 8 MB vs 15 MB (7MB) 47% smaller processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 41.6 GB/s vs 68 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (26.4GB/s) 39% slower
2nd Choice
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i3-10300 Intel i3-10300
Intel i3-10100T Intel i3-10100T
vs
Intel i3-10300 Intel i3-10300
Intel i3-3225 Intel i3-3225
vs
Intel i3-10300 Intel i3-10300
Intel i7-11700T Intel i7-11700T
vs
Intel i3-10300 Intel i3-10300
Intel i5-11400T Intel i5-11400T
vs
Intel i3-10300 Intel i3-10300
Intel i5-9600T Intel i5-9600T
vs
Intel i3-10300 Intel i3-10300
AMD Ryzen 3960X AMD Ryzen 3960X
vs
Intel i3-10300 Intel i3-10300
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X AMD Ryzen 5 3600X
vs
Intel i3-10300 Intel i3-10300
Intel i3-4330T Intel i3-4330T
vs
Intel i3-10300 Intel i3-10300
Intel i5-11400F Intel i5-11400F
vs
Intel i3-10300 Intel i3-10300
Intel i5-7600 Intel i5-7600
vs