Search
Compare

Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor

3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
3.3/10 Score 2409
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 440
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

22 nm

12 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

6

4

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

12

8

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second

3.3 GHz

8% higher

3.6 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

3.6 GHz

10% higher

4 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

15 MB

8 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
36% faster

68 GB/s

43.7 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

64 GB

Generation

5

0

Socket

2011

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

140 Watts

54% lower

65 Watts

Recommended
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
Cores 6 vs 4 (2) 33% more physical cores
Threads 12 vs 8 (4) 33% more logical cores
Cache 15 MB vs 8 MB (7MB) 47% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 68 GB/s vs 43.7 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (24.3GB/s) 36% faster
CONS 4
CPU Architecture 22 nm vs 12 nm CPU architecture size is (10nm) 45% smaller
CPU Clock 3.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Clock speed is (0.3GHz) 8% lower
CPU Turbo Clock 3.6 GHz vs 4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.4GHz) 10% lower
Thermal Design Power 140 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% higher
2nd Choice
3.3/10 Score 2409
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i9-10900 Intel i9-10900
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i7-6700K Intel i7-6700K
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i7-4790 Intel i7-4790
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i5-8600T Intel i5-8600T
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i5-9600K Intel i5-9600K
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i5-4570S Intel i5-4570S
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i9-9900K Intel i9-9900K
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i3-9350K Intel i3-9350K
vs