Search
Compare

Intel i3-9300 4-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1151 62W Desktop Processor AMD Ryzen 5 1600 6-core 3.2 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor

3.1/10 Score 2304
Intel i3-9300 4-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1151 62W Desktop Processor
3.5/10 Score 2542
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 6-core 3.2 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
$ 85
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

4

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

4

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
14% higher

3.7 GHz

3.2 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
16% higher

4.3 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

8 MB

16 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

37.5 GB/s

6% faster

40 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

64 GB

Generation

9

0

Socket

1151

0

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
5% lower

62 Watts

65 Watts

Recommended
3.1/10 Score 2304
Intel i3-9300 4-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1151 62W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i3-9300 4-core 3.7 GHz Socket 1151 62W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 3
CPU Clock 3.7 GHz vs 3.2 GHz Clock speed is (0.5GHz) 14% higher
CPU Turbo Clock 4.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.7GHz) 16% higher
Thermal Design Power 62 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (3Watts) 5% lower
CONS 4
Cores 4 vs 6 (2) 33% less physical cores
Threads 4 vs 12 (8) 67% less logical cores
Cache 8 MB vs 16 MB (8MB) 50% smaller processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 37.5 GB/s vs 40 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (2.5GB/s) 6% slower
2nd Choice
3.5/10 Score 2542
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 6-core 3.2 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 6-core 3.2 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i3-9300 Intel i3-9300
Intel i5-11600K Intel i5-11600K
vs
Intel i3-9300 Intel i3-9300
AMD Ryzen 7 2700 AMD Ryzen 7 2700
vs
Intel i3-9300 Intel i3-9300
Intel i7-4770S Intel i7-4770S
vs
Intel i3-9300 Intel i3-9300
Intel i7-10700T Intel i7-10700T
vs
Intel i3-9300 Intel i3-9300
AMD Ryzen 3 2300X AMD Ryzen 3 2300X
vs
Intel i3-9300 Intel i3-9300
Intel i5-3470T Intel i5-3470T
vs
Intel i3-9300 Intel i3-9300
Intel i9-11900F Intel i9-11900F
vs
Intel i3-9300 Intel i3-9300
Intel i5-3470 Intel i5-3470
vs
Intel i3-9300 Intel i3-9300
Intel i5-8400T Intel i5-8400T
vs
Intel i3-9300 Intel i3-9300
Intel i5-4430 Intel i5-4430
vs