Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor Intel i9-8950HK 6-core 2.9 GHz Socket 1440 45W Desktop Processor

3.3/10 Score 2409
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
3.5/10 Score 2534
Intel i9-8950HK 6-core 2.9 GHz Socket 1440 45W Desktop Processor
vs
N\A
N\A
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

12 nm

14 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

4

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

8

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
19% higher

3.6 GHz

2.9 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock

4 GHz

17% higher

4.8 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

8 MB

12 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

Yes

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM
4% faster

43.7 GB/s

41.8 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

64 GB

Generation

0

8

Socket

0

1440

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit

65 Watts

31% lower

45 Watts

Recommended
3.5/10 Score 2534
Intel i9-8950HK 6-core 2.9 GHz Socket 1440 45W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i9-8950HK 6-core 2.9 GHz Socket 1440 45W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 5
Cores 6 vs 4 (2) 33% more physical cores
Threads 12 vs 8 (4) 33% more logical cores
CPU Turbo Clock 4.8 GHz vs 4 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.8GHz) 17% higher
Cache 12 MB vs 8 MB (4MB) 33% bigger processor cache memory
Thermal Design Power 45 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (20Watts) 31% lower
CONS 3
CPU Architecture 14 nm vs 12 nm CPU architecture size is (2nm) 14% smaller
CPU Clock 2.9 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Clock speed is (0.7GHz) 19% lower
Memory Bandwidth 41.8 GB/s vs 43.7 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (1.9GB/s) 4% slower
2nd Choice
3.3/10 Score 2409
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 2500X 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i9-8950HK Intel i9-8950HK
Intel i5-11600KF Intel i5-11600KF
vs
Intel i9-8950HK Intel i9-8950HK
AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE AMD Ryzen 3 3200GE
vs
Intel i9-8950HK Intel i9-8950HK
Intel i7-6850K Intel i7-6850K
vs
Intel i9-8950HK Intel i9-8950HK
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
vs
Intel i9-8950HK Intel i9-8950HK
Intel i5-11600T Intel i5-11600T
vs
Intel i9-8950HK Intel i9-8950HK
Intel i9-9900T Intel i9-9900T
vs
Intel i9-8950HK Intel i9-8950HK
Intel i3-7300 Intel i3-7300
vs
Intel i9-8950HK Intel i9-8950HK
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 AMD Ryzen 5 3600
vs
Intel i9-8950HK Intel i9-8950HK
Intel i9-10980XE Intel i9-10980XE
vs
Intel i9-8950HK Intel i9-8950HK
AMD Ryzen 3970X AMD Ryzen 3970X
vs