Search
Compare

AMD Ryzen 5 2400G 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor

3.2/10 Score 2342
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
vs
$ 150
$ 440
Compare
Share with friends
Copy link

Share

Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Reddit
Email
Navigation Compare navigation
  • Left Won
  • Draw
  • Left Lost
CPU ArchitectureCoresThreadsCPU ClockCPU Turbo ClockCacheDDR3DDR4Memory BandwidthMaximum MemoryGenerationSocketThermal Design Power
Go to Results
Visual view Simple view
CPU Architecture The smaller CPU, the better performance

14 nm

22 nm

Cores The more Cores, the more tasks CPU can perform at the same time

4

6

Threads Threads are not physical cores, but they help with multitasking

8

12

CPU Clock The higher the clock, the more instructions CPU can execute per second
8% higher

3.6 GHz

3.3 GHz

CPU Turbo Clock CPU turbo clock helps to squeeze more performance by increasing base clock
8% higher

3.9 GHz

3.6 GHz

Cache CPU stores copies of the frequently used data to the cache for faster execution

4 MB

15 MB

DDR3 Type of memory CPU supports

No

No

DDR4 Type of memory CPU supports

Yes

Yes

Memory Bandwidth The more bandwidth, the faster data is transfered between CPU and RAM

43.7 GB/s

36% faster

68 GB/s

Maximum Memory The maximum amount of memory CPU can support

64 GB

64 GB

Generation

0

5

Socket

0

2011

Thermal Design Power Typical power consumption of the Central Processing Unit
54% lower

65 Watts

140 Watts

Recommended
3.6/10 Score 2674
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
Intel i7-5820K 6-core 3.3 GHz Socket 2011 140W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
PROS 4
Cores 6 vs 4 (2) 33% more physical cores
Threads 12 vs 8 (4) 33% more logical cores
Cache 15 MB vs 4 MB (11MB) 73% bigger processor cache memory
Memory Bandwidth 68 GB/s vs 43.7 GB/s Memory bandwidth is (24.3GB/s) 36% faster
CONS 4
CPU Architecture 22 nm vs 14 nm CPU architecture size is (8nm) 36% smaller
CPU Clock 3.3 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Clock speed is (0.3GHz) 8% lower
CPU Turbo Clock 3.6 GHz vs 3.9 GHz Turbo clock speed is (0.3GHz) 8% lower
Thermal Design Power 140 Watts vs 65 Watts Power consumption is (75Watts) 54% higher
2nd Choice
3.2/10 Score 2342
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Add to Favorite
AMD Ryzen 5 2400G 4-core 3.6 GHz Socket 0 65W Desktop Processor
Benchmark
Full specs
Compatible
To build
You might also like Scroll/Slide to the left or to the right side
More comparisons
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i3-7101E Intel i3-7101E
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i5-3570S Intel i5-3570S
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i5-3340S Intel i5-3340S
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i9-11900 Intel i9-11900
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i5-4670 Intel i5-4670
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i5-4590S Intel i5-4590S
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i5-3470 Intel i5-3470
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i7-8086K Intel i7-8086K
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i5-3330 Intel i5-3330
vs
Intel i7-5820K Intel i7-5820K
Intel i5-4570T Intel i5-4570T
vs